Constrained Flow Policy Updates: A Generalized Schrödinger Bridge View

Practical Tips

Practical tips and how-to guidance will be added by our editorial team.

中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站将优先为睡眠改善、失眠治疗、助眠方法等高价值文章补充中文说明。

Article Summary

Online safe reinforcement learning (RL) seeks policies that maximize reward while satisfying safety constraints. Reward and safety can induce multimodal action distributions, challenging the prevailing primal-dual methods: Gaussian actors may collapse onto a single suboptimal mode, and optimization over the nonconvex Lagrangian landscape can be unstable. Diffusion and flow policies can represent such distributions, but recent work with a diffusion actor relies on estimating and matching the score of an augmented-Lagrangian target policy. Instead, we differentiate the augmented objective directly through the generation path of a flow policy, so no score needs to be estimated. Because a flow policy lacks a readily available action log-density for entropy regularization, we build on the density-free kinetic-energy regularizer of FLAC, a recent reward-only method, and propose Reparameterized Augmented-Lagrangian Flow Actor with Least Energy (RAFALE), an off-policy actor-critic method for safe RL. We formulate its update as a constrained one-ended generalized Schrödinger bridge and show that, for each source draw, this path-space problem is exactly an entropy-regularized problem in action space. At positive noise, its solution reweights the reward-only action distribution only where the estimated cost exceeds a threshold set by the Lagrange multiplier. As the noise vanishes, the optimal value converges to that of a least-energy map objective that the flow policy optimizes directly. Across seven Safety-Gymnasium tasks, RAFALE achieves competitive reward with mean final cost within budget on every task, whereas strong baselines trade one for the other; ablations support the necessity of both its augmented objective and its flow actor.

Sources & References

• Original source
• Full article (PDF)

Comments