CLIS-MPPI: Closed-Loop Model Predictive Path Integral Control With Initial-State Sampling Under Execution Delay

Practical Tips

Practical tips and how-to guidance will be added by our editorial team.

中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站将优先为睡眠改善、失眠治疗、助眠方法等高价值文章补充中文说明。

Article Summary

Sampling-based motion planning such as Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) control has become attractive for robotics due to its ability to handle nonlinear dynamics and non-smooth objectives without gradient information, while leveraging parallel rollout computation for real-time performance. However, in real-world robotic systems, the optimized control input is often applied after a non-negligible planning delay, causing a mismatch between the state used in forward simulation and the actual state at control execution, which can significantly degrade planning accuracy and may even lead to unsafe behavior such as collisions. This paper proposes Closed-Loop MPPI with Initial-State Sampling (CLIS-MPPI), which explicitly addresses execution-time state mismatch by modeling planning delay as a distribution over plausible execution-time initial states, performing rollout optimization from sampled initial states, and applying a rollout-based local feedback correction during control execution. The proposed method is validated through real-world experiments on a 6-DoF UR5e manipulator in a narrow-passage task involving obstacle avoidance and end-effector target reaching. Across 5 real-world runs of the same task, standard MPPI collided in 2 runs, whereas CLIS-MPPI remained collision-free in all 5 runs. Averaged over all collision-free runs for each method (3 for MPPI and 5 for CLIS-MPPI), CLIS-MPPI reduced the average task completion time from 25.4s to 24.4s and the average end-effector path length from 0.456 m to 0.425 m. It also reduced the overall joint-position and joint-velocity root mean square errors (RMSEs) from 0.100 rad and 0.108 rad/s to 0.017 rad and 0.011 rad/s, respectively. These results demonstrate improved safety, planning-execution consistency, and motion smoothness.

Sources & References

• Original source
• Full article (PDF)

Comments